I'm an Eagles fan who subscribes because I love watching Mahomes and will always be a fan of Andy Reid. I can't disagree with your assessment. I feel that Mahomes is the Michael Jordan of football: a unique, unprecedented talent who does things every game that no other player could do. He probably needs at least one or two more titles to get to GOAT status by the time his career is done, but that seems like the trajectory. He's the best player in the NFL every year.
That said, even Michael Jordan didn't win MVP every year. It's absurd that he didn't, but there were also some deserving competitors who were close enough in a given season that the desire for MVP variety kicked in. The (biased) case I can make for Hurts would rely on the tangible stats of team record (which obviously counts for something, or you'd see MVPs from sub-500 teams); better ball security by far than the other candidates; and the intangible that Hurts' numbers have suffered a fair bit from Philly having the luxury of taking its foot off the gas in the passing game in several of their victories (even the close ones where they ran to close out the games. Sure, that's a benefit for overall record, but doesn't help in the stats department).
In any case, the injury news this week probably places Hurts out of the picture as a candidate. I don't really see much of a case for the way-too-inconsistent (but still great) Allen, and while Burrow should get some credit for operating behind whatever Cincy's o-line is doing, they'd probably have to finish as the 1 seed for him to vault over the top.
In short, barring a KC collapse down the stretch, it seems like Mahomes's award to lose for all the reasons you cite.
I can see it now. I'll just share the link to the article, they won't read it, and nothing will be accomplished. Sounds like par for the course with sports arguments.
I wish MVP voters would spend as much time educating themselves as Seth spent writing this iron clad case for Patrick Levon Mahomes II. It's really a no brainer.
And the winner for "Best Argument" goes to...# 9, the eye test! Stats are great, and nobody collects them like Pat, but just his sheer flair and daring as he plays the position on any given Sunday is what separates him from all other QBs. There's a reason the Chiefs are featured in the maximum number of primetime games every season and that is to showcase the premier player in the NFL. No one else plays the position with his level of intellect, confidence and composure so consistently. Pat is must-see TV every week in the NFL just like Jordan was in the NBA; both of them undisputed, generational talents. If you're still not convinced, just watch.
I'm really hoping we have a year soon where we won't have to point to Mahomes being able to overcome a terrible defense and serious OL issues as part of his case for MVP.
I agree w/Mr. Edler. WTH Seth? We're out here, paying our 12 bucks a year for quality content, you're mailing #9 in w/no GIFs. INCREDIBLY DISAPPOINTING. (All caps, 2 words, for emphasis) I think you need to shake the vacation sand off and get back in the groove. And again, can't come up w/10 takeaways? Two articles in a row. It's just... well we expect better, that's all. It's disappointing.
I will be using any and all of these in the coming weeks, a great synthesis of the facts!
Seth out here doing the Lord's work. Thank you for this bounty of goodness.
Hi preacher, this here's a choir!
The defensive stat is indefensible. I don't dislike Spags, but he and veach don't seem to be on the same page regarding scheme.
I'm an Eagles fan who subscribes because I love watching Mahomes and will always be a fan of Andy Reid. I can't disagree with your assessment. I feel that Mahomes is the Michael Jordan of football: a unique, unprecedented talent who does things every game that no other player could do. He probably needs at least one or two more titles to get to GOAT status by the time his career is done, but that seems like the trajectory. He's the best player in the NFL every year.
That said, even Michael Jordan didn't win MVP every year. It's absurd that he didn't, but there were also some deserving competitors who were close enough in a given season that the desire for MVP variety kicked in. The (biased) case I can make for Hurts would rely on the tangible stats of team record (which obviously counts for something, or you'd see MVPs from sub-500 teams); better ball security by far than the other candidates; and the intangible that Hurts' numbers have suffered a fair bit from Philly having the luxury of taking its foot off the gas in the passing game in several of their victories (even the close ones where they ran to close out the games. Sure, that's a benefit for overall record, but doesn't help in the stats department).
In any case, the injury news this week probably places Hurts out of the picture as a candidate. I don't really see much of a case for the way-too-inconsistent (but still great) Allen, and while Burrow should get some credit for operating behind whatever Cincy's o-line is doing, they'd probably have to finish as the 1 seed for him to vault over the top.
In short, barring a KC collapse down the stretch, it seems like Mahomes's award to lose for all the reasons you cite.
I can see it now. I'll just share the link to the article, they won't read it, and nothing will be accomplished. Sounds like par for the course with sports arguments.
I wish MVP voters would spend as much time educating themselves as Seth spent writing this iron clad case for Patrick Levon Mahomes II. It's really a no brainer.
I think I'll refer to #9 most. I've noticed that people who want to debate MVP choices typically ignore anything closely resembling statistics.
BTW, Seth is Chiefsaholic a CITN subscriber? Thinking a few of us might need to pitch in and renew for him.
It's pretty obvious who the MVP is.
And the winner for "Best Argument" goes to...# 9, the eye test! Stats are great, and nobody collects them like Pat, but just his sheer flair and daring as he plays the position on any given Sunday is what separates him from all other QBs. There's a reason the Chiefs are featured in the maximum number of primetime games every season and that is to showcase the premier player in the NFL. No one else plays the position with his level of intellect, confidence and composure so consistently. Pat is must-see TV every week in the NFL just like Jordan was in the NBA; both of them undisputed, generational talents. If you're still not convinced, just watch.
Slam dunk in the epic Dr. J or Jordan or Dominque with some power style.
I'm really hoping we have a year soon where we won't have to point to Mahomes being able to overcome a terrible defense and serious OL issues as part of his case for MVP.
Wonderful article Seth!
My only complaint is that #9 doesn't have more gifs to prove your point XD
Seth, please immediately forward this article to all the MVP selectors! (And have they already voted? I hope not until after game 17.)
I agree w/Mr. Edler. WTH Seth? We're out here, paying our 12 bucks a year for quality content, you're mailing #9 in w/no GIFs. INCREDIBLY DISAPPOINTING. (All caps, 2 words, for emphasis) I think you need to shake the vacation sand off and get back in the groove. And again, can't come up w/10 takeaways? Two articles in a row. It's just... well we expect better, that's all. It's disappointing.
As I'm reading this at lunch the headline on the TV tuned to ESPN says "Should Hurts still be the MVP favorite".
Quick answer No.
Patrick LAVON Mahomes II. Lavon? Seriously? Who knew!?